SHAKE MAGAZINE TECHNOLOGY
The AI Trick That Works by Refusing to Help You
Why getting less help from artificial intelligence might actually make you a better student.
Explore the 30-second challengeArtificial intelligence has become an everyday part of studying, allowing students to solve difficult problems, understand complicated topics and complete assignments faster than ever before. Whenever we get stuck, the answer is usually just a few clicks away. However, while AI makes studying easier, recent research suggests that this convenience might come at an unexpected cost. What if getting help too quickly is actually preventing us from learning?
In research published in 2026, Stefanos Poulidis, Hamsa Bastani and Osbert Bastani investigated how access to artificial intelligence influences learning. Over a period of 12 weeks, they studied more than 200 chess-club students who were learning with AI assistance. Both groups received guidance from AI, but one group had the additional option of requesting help whenever they wanted. Surprisingly, students who could ask for extra assistance improved their chess performance by approximately 30%, while those with more restricted access improved by 64%.
When More Help Led to Less Learning
More than 200 chess students. Twelve weeks of AI-assisted training. One important difference in how they could request help.
System-regulated
AI assistance
Additional AI assistance
on demand
Both groups received automatically timed AI guidance. Only the on-demand group could request extra assistance whenever they wanted.
These results highlight an important aspect of learning known as productive struggle. When we encounter a difficult problem and attempt to solve it independently, our brains must actively work with information, consider different possibilities and recognize mistakes. Although this process can be frustrating, it plays an important role in developing our understanding. By immediately providing answers, AI can sometimes remove precisely the mental effort that makes learning effective.
Fortunately, this doesn’t mean we should stop using ChatGPT or other AI tools. Instead, we could change the way we interact with them. One simple idea is the 30-second rule: whenever you encounter a difficult question, spend at least 30 seconds trying to solve it yourself before asking AI for assistance. Even after that, consider requesting a small hint rather than a complete solution, allowing yourself to continue working through the problem independently.
Can You Think for 30 Seconds Without AI?
Before asking for help, give your brain a chance to solve the problem.
A jacket costs €100. Its price increases by 20%, then decreases by 20%. Is the final price €100?
Hint 1
The 20% decrease is calculated from the new, higher price — not the original €100.
Hint 2
First calculate 20% more than €100. Then calculate 20% less than that new amount.
The full explanation
€100 × 1.20 × 0.80 = €96
The increase takes the price to €120. The decrease is 20% of €120 (€24), so it removes more money than the original €20 increase.
You just tried the 30-second rule.
The goal wasn't to answer perfectly. It was to make an honest attempt before receiving help.
Your answer stays on this page. It is never saved or sent.
Same Question. Two Very Different Tutors.
One AI solves the problem for you. The other helps you solve it yourself.
Illustrative scripted conversations. This is not a live AI chat.
INSTANT ANSWERS
- Student
- How do I solve this problem?
- AI
- The jacket costs €96. First, €100 increases to €120. Then a 20% decrease reduces the price to €96.
Fast and convenient, but the student may skip the reasoning.
GUIDED LEARNING
- Student
- How do I solve this problem?
- AI
- Before I explain, take 30 seconds to try it yourself. What would you calculate first?
- Student
- Maybe I should increase €100 by 20%?
- AI
- Exactly. What is the new price, and which amount should the next 20% be calculated from?
The AI encourages an independent attempt before providing targeted support.
While the researchers did not specifically test a 30-second waiting period, this simple experiment applies the central lesson of their findings: the timing and amount of assistance can matter just as much as the assistance itself.
AI has enormous potential to improve education, but its greatest value may not lie in how quickly it provides answers. Sometimes, the most effective learning assistant is one that encourages us to think independently, even when doing so takes a little longer.
Perhaps the smartest AI tutor isn’t the one that always knows the answer, but the one that knows when not to give it to you.
Make ChatGPT Refuse to Help You
We've prepared a special study prompt inspired by the research. Copy it into ChatGPT and turn your AI assistant into a tutor that encourages you to think before giving you the answer.
“Your job is not to think for me.
Your job is to make me think.”
Read the complete study prompt
Copy the prompt, then paste it into a new ChatGPT conversation.
ChatGPT cannot reliably enforce a real-time waiting period through prompt instructions alone. Use your own timer and share your attempt after 30 seconds.
FURTHER READING
Research & Sources
The study concerns chess performance. The 30-second activity is an educational adaptation, not an intervention tested in the experiment.
- Working paperSelf-Regulated AI Use Hinders Long-Term Learning
Stefanos Poulidis, Hamsa Bastani and Osbert Bastani. Working-paper version, revised in 2026.
- Published proceedingsAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2026
Conference proceedings version. DOI: 10.5465/AMPROC.2026.383bp.
- Knowledge at WhartonWhen Does AI Assistance Undermine Learning?
An explanation of the study and its implications for AI-assisted learning.
- INSEAD KnowledgeHow On-Demand AI Assistance Undermines Learning
The researchers explain the experiment, productive struggle and on-demand help.